Every customer waiting to integrate is lost revenue in your P&L.
RWS cuts onboarding from months to hours, so the enterprise contract closed in Q1 doesn't only become revenue in Q3.
A signed contract doesn't become revenue until the customer is live
2–4
months
between signed contract and go-live in enterprise onboardings
8.3%
of ARR
of first-year revenue is missed for every month without go-live
GTM
stalled
when sales closes faster than onboarding can activate
Three changes that take integrations off the critical path
Technical logic stays encapsulated.
Engineering builds connectors in hours for any system — APIs, databases, files or legacy systems, including environments behind VPNs. The complexity lives in the platform, not in manual projects per customer.
Configuration moves to onboarding.
Once the connector is built, the onboarding team configures new customers in minutes safely: credentials, parameters, fields, rules and tests before go-live. All within the standards engineering has set.
Operations come ready to scale.
RWS ships the operational layer of integrations out of the box: execution, monitoring, logs, errors, history and reprocessing. Onboarding configures new customers without touching infrastructure, while engineering keeps end-to-end visibility.
Nexti turned payroll-system integrations into a scalable onboarding operation
“With RWS, we stopped treating each integration as a new technical project. We built connectors for Brazil's main payroll systems, including environments behind VPN. Today we run more than 200 integrations in production with much more speed and predictability.”
Lucas Ávila, CPO
Nexti
200+
active integrations in production
2 months
reduced from onboarding time
Connectors
built for Sankhya, TOTVS Protheus, TOTVS RM Labore, Senior, LG
Test RWS on a real onboarding you're stuck on
01
Bring us your worst case
The new customer stuck waiting for go-live, or the system that always drags engineering into onboarding.
02
Engineering builds the connector in hours
Our team guides the first use of RWS to prove the product in practice: logic, fields, rules, tests, execution, monitoring and reprocessing on a single platform.
03
Onboarding repeats in minutes
Once the connector is validated, we pick a second similar customer. Onboarding configures the new case inside RWS — without turning it into another technical project.
B2B infrastructure to run integrations that can't fail
Reliable
99.9% platform availability SLA for integrations in production.
Fast
Transactional flows run in under 1 minute; high-volume flows in under 15 minutes. Capacity scales automatically — your team doesn't configure or run infrastructure.
Secure
RWS runs on secure AWS environments. Data is encrypted while temporarily stored during processing, and isn't retained after the integration flow ends.
Isolated
Each integration runs in an isolated environment, so one customer, connector or load volume doesn't affect another's execution.
Resilient
Observability, rate-limit control, throttling, idempotency, caching, exponential-backoff retries and safe reprocessing come built in. When something fails, alerts point to the customers, the flow and the reason.
What people usually ask
No. RWS is infrastructure for your company to build, operate and reuse connectors with your customer' systems. The point isn't picking a ready-made connector from a store; it's turning custom integrations into repeatable onboarding.
That's exactly the case RWS was built for. The platform supports integrations with APIs (REST and SOAP), databases, files, legacy systems, internal ERPs and environments behind corporate VPNs.
Engineering builds the first connector on RWS, with our team's support at the start. Your team defines logic, fields, rules and validations. RWS provides the execution, operations, monitoring and reprocessing layer.
Yes. Once the connector is validated, onboarding configures new customer with the same pattern: credentials, parameters, fields, variable rules, tests and go-live inside RWS.
No. Onboarding gains autonomy to configure, but engineering keeps visibility over executions, errors, history, logs and reprocessings.
The best test is a real case: a customer waiting for go-live or an old integration that took too long. The idea is to prove in practice that engineering can build the first connector in hours and onboarding can repeat the next one in minutes.
Zapier and n8n are good for horizontal automations. MuleSoft is a heavy enterprise suite. RWS sits somewhere else: operational infrastructure for repeatable B2B integrations, where engineering builds the connector and onboarding scales the configuration per customer.
No. RWS removes the repetitive integration work without removing technical control. Engineering keeps defining the standard; onboarding stops depending on engineering to repeat the same kind of integration customer by customer.
Stop losing revenue on integrations
See how to get RWS running with your stack